Yo-Yo Test vs Bronco Test: Which Fitness Drill Pushes Players Harder?
A closer look at two of cricket’s most debated endurance tests, Yo-Yo Test and Bronco Test
Fitness has become a non-negotiable standard in modern cricket, particularly for India, where players navigate a packed international and franchise schedule. Over the years, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has adopted rigorous assessments to ensure players are physically equipped for the demands of the game.
The Yo-Yo Test, introduced in 2017 during Anil Kumble’s tenure as head coach, set the benchmark at 16.1 for Indian players. The drill requires players to complete 20-metre shuttle runs with a 10-second recovery period, simulating the short, explosive bursts typical in cricket.
It quickly became a decisive factor in selection: while players like Yuvraj Singh and Suresh Raina missed out after failing, others such as Virat Kohli and Hardik Pandya were lauded for excelling.
More recently, under head coach Gautam Gambhir and strength and conditioning expert Adrian le Roux, India have introduced the Bronco Test. Borrowed from rugby and football, the Bronco consists of five sets of 20m, 40m, and 60m shuttle runs totalling 1,200m with a target time of under six minutes. Unlike the Yo-Yo, the Bronco allows no rest periods, demanding stamina, speed, and mental resilience in one continuous challenge.
The Bronco is seen as particularly beneficial for bowlers, as it mirrors the sustained exertion of long spells. The Yo-Yo, however, remains the more cricket-specific measure, aligning with batting and fielding patterns that require quick bursts followed by recovery.
Together, the two tests underline Indian cricket’s shift toward comprehensive fitness standards, ensuring players are prepared for both the intensity of T20 cricket and the endurance required in Tests and ODIs.

